Industrial CNC Machine Directory

Machine Comparison

Bystronic Xpress 160 vs LVD Dyna-Press Plus

Bystronic vs LVD · CNC Press Brakes

01

Summary

The Bystronic Xpress 160 from Bystronic and LVD Dyna-Press Plus from LVD are direct competitors in the cnc press brakes category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a cnc press brake.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification Bystronic Xpress 160 LVD Dyna-Press Plus
Control ByVision Bending (touchscreen) Touch-B touchscreen
Stroke 250 mm (9.8 in) 150 mm
Approach Speed 150 mm/s (354 ipm) 200 mm/sec
Pressing Speed 10 mm/s (24 ipm) 25 mm/sec
Price Range $80,000 - $130,000 (new); $50,000 - $90,000 (used 2018-2022) $45,000-$75,000 (new); $25,000-$45,000 (used)
03

Advantages

Bystronic Xpress 160

  • Superior stroke at 250 mm (9.8 in) vs 150 mm
  • Backed by Bystronic's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • General fabrication shops adding their first CNC press brake who want proven technology without the premium price tag of a top-tier machine

LVD Dyna-Press Plus

  • Superior approach speed at 200 mm/sec vs 150 mm/s (354 ipm)
  • Superior pressing speed at 25 mm/sec vs 10 mm/s (24 ipm)
  • More competitive pricing at $45,000-$75,000 (new); $25,000-$45,000 (used) compared to $80,000 - $130,000 (new); $50,000 - $90,000 (used 2018-2022)
04

Verdict

This is a close matchup. The Bystronic Xpress 160 and LVD Dyna-Press Plus trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.