Industrial CNC Machine Directory

Machine Comparison

Mazak SVC vs Mazak UN

Yamazaki Mazak vs Yamazaki Mazak · Vertical Machining Centers

01

Summary

The Mazak SVC and Mazak UN are both from Yamazaki Mazak's vertical machining centers lineup, making this a common upgrade or lineup decision for shops already invested in the Yamazaki Mazak ecosystem. The Mazak UN leads in x travel (1,020 mm (40.2 in) vs 900 mm (35.4 in)). The Mazak UN leads in tool capacity (30 (arm-type ATC) vs 24 (arm-type ATC)). The Mazak UN leads in spindle power (18.5 kW (25 hp) vs 15 kW (20 hp)). The Mazak UN shows specification advantages in 6 categories, though the Mazak SVC may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a vertical machining center.

02

Specifications Comparison

Specification Mazak SVC Mazak UN
X-Axis Travel 900 mm (35.4 in) 1,020 mm (40.2 in)
Y-Axis Travel 500 mm (19.7 in) 510 mm (20.1 in)
Z-Axis Travel 450 mm (17.7 in) 460 mm (18.1 in)
Max Spindle Speed 12,000 RPM 12,000 RPM
Spindle Power 15 kW (20 hp) 18.5 kW (25 hp)
Tool Capacity 24 (arm-type ATC) 30 (arm-type ATC)
Table Size 1,100 x 500 mm (43.3 x 19.7 in) 1,200 x 500 mm (47.2 x 19.7 in)
Control MAZATROL SmoothG CNC MAZATROL SmoothG CNC
Spindle Taper BT 40 BT 40
Max Table Load 800 kg (1,764 lb) 1,000 kg (2,205 lb)
Guide Type Linear roller guides (all axes) Linear roller guides (all axes)
Price Range $100,000 - $145,000 $110,000 - $155,000
03

Advantages

Mazak SVC

  • More competitive pricing at $100,000 - $145,000 compared to $110,000 - $155,000
  • Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
  • Automotive component manufacturers running production volumes that demand consistent throughput and automation capability

Mazak UN

  • Greater x travel of 1,020 mm (40.2 in) accommodates larger workpieces
  • Greater z travel of 460 mm (18.1 in) accommodates larger workpieces
  • More spindle power at 18.5 kW (25 hp) for aggressive material removal in harder materials
  • Larger tool magazine with 30 (arm-type ATC) capacity reduces manual tool changes on complex parts
  • Superior table size at 1,200 x 500 mm (47.2 x 19.7 in) vs 1,100 x 500 mm (43.3 x 19.7 in)
04

Verdict

The Mazak UN edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in X Travel and Z Travel. However, the Mazak SVC remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.