Machine Comparison
Mazak INTEGREX AG vs Starrag Bumotec s191H
Yamazaki Mazak vs Starrag · Mill-Turn Machines
Summary
The Mazak INTEGREX AG from Yamazaki Mazak and Starrag Bumotec s191H from Starrag are direct competitors in the mill-turn machines category. The Starrag Bumotec s191H leads in tool capacity (90 positions vs 36-72 tools by base platform). These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a mill-turn machine.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Mazak INTEGREX AG | Starrag Bumotec s191H |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Capacity | 36-72 tools by base platform | 90 positions ▲ |
| Control | MAZATROL SmoothAi CNC with gear machining cycles | Fanuc 31i-B5 |
| Milling Spindle Speed | 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal) | 40,000 RPM ▲ |
| Price Range | $350,000 - $1,200,000+ ▲ | $400,000 - $650,000 |
Advantages
Mazak INTEGREX AG
- More competitive pricing at $350,000 - $1,200,000+ compared to $400,000 - $650,000
- Backed by Yamazaki Mazak's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Automotive transmission manufacturers producing geared shafts and splined components
Starrag Bumotec s191H
- Larger tool magazine with 90 positions capacity reduces manual tool changes on complex parts
- Superior milling spindle speed at 40,000 RPM vs 12,000 RPM (20,000 RPM optional on horizontal)
- Backed by Starrag's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Swiss watchmaking manufacturers producing cases, movements, bridges, and plates requiring micron-level accuracy across milled and turned features
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Mazak INTEGREX AG and Starrag Bumotec s191H trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.