Machine Comparison
Makino BX3 vs Mitsubishi EA12V
Makino vs Mitsubishi Electric · Sinker EDM
Summary
The Makino BX3 from Makino and Mitsubishi EA12V from Mitsubishi Electric are direct competitors in the sinker edm category. The Mitsubishi EA12V leads in x travel (400 mm (15.7 in) vs 200 mm (7.9 in)). The Mitsubishi EA12V shows specification advantages in 4 categories, though the Makino BX3 may still be the better choice depending on your shop's specific needs and the type of work you run. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a sinker edm.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Makino BX3 | Mitsubishi EA12V |
|---|---|---|
| X-Axis Travel | 200 mm (7.9 in) | 400 mm (15.7 in) ▲ |
| Y-Axis Travel | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 300 mm (11.8 in) ▲ |
| Z-Axis Travel | 150 mm (5.9 in) | 300 mm (11.8 in) ▲ |
| Control | Makino Hyper-i (touchscreen) | M700 CNC (PC-based, touchscreen) |
| Max Workpiece Weight | 150 kg (331 lb) | 700 kg (1,540 lb) ▲ |
| Price Range | $90,000 - $140,000 ▲ | $100,000 - $160,000 |
Advantages
Makino BX3
- More competitive pricing at $90,000 - $140,000 compared to $100,000 - $160,000
- Backed by Makino's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Connector mold shops burning micro-pin cavities, micro-slots, and fine-pitch features in hardened mold steels
Mitsubishi EA12V
- Greater x travel of 400 mm (15.7 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater y travel of 300 mm (11.8 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Greater z travel of 300 mm (11.8 in) accommodates larger workpieces
- Superior max workpiece weight at 700 kg (1,540 lb) vs 150 kg (331 lb)
Verdict
The Mitsubishi EA12V edges ahead on specifications in this comparison, particularly in X Travel and Y Travel. However, the Makino BX3 remains competitive and may be the better choice depending on price, dealer support in your area, or specific workholding and tooling considerations. Both are capable machines — the best decision comes from running your actual parts and evaluating total cost of ownership including tooling, training, and service.