Machine Comparison
Hanwha STL-12 vs Tsugami B0125
Hanwha vs Tsugami · Swiss-Type Lathes
Summary
The Hanwha STL-12 from Hanwha and Tsugami B0125 from Tsugami are direct competitors in the swiss-type lathes category. These machines are closely matched across most specifications, making the decision more about specific feature priorities, dealer support, and your existing shop ecosystem than raw spec advantages. Both machines are proven performers in production environments and represent solid investments for shops in the market for a swiss-type lathe.
Specifications Comparison
| Specification | Hanwha STL-12 | Tsugami B0125 |
|---|---|---|
| Control | FANUC 32i-B | Fanuc 32i-B |
| Main Spindle Speed | 10,000 rpm | 10,000 RPM |
| Sub Spindle Speed | 10,000 rpm | 10,000 RPM |
| Live Tool Speed | 8,000 rpm | 8,000 RPM |
| Tool Positions | Up to 16 | Up to 21 ▲ |
| Guide Bushing | Standard (GBL option available) | Yes, adjustable |
| Machine Weight | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb) | 1,800 kg (3,968 lb) |
| Price Range | $80,000 - $120,000 ▲ | $180,000 - $280,000 |
Advantages
Hanwha STL-12
- More competitive pricing at $80,000 - $120,000 compared to $180,000 - $280,000
- Backed by Hanwha's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Electronic connector manufacturers running high-volume brass and copper pins, sockets, and contacts under 12mm diameter
Tsugami B0125
- Superior tool positions at Up to 21 vs Up to 16
- Backed by Tsugami's dealer and service network for parts and support
- Medical device manufacturers producing bone screws, dental implants, and surgical instrument components in titanium and stainless steel
Verdict
This is a close matchup. The Hanwha STL-12 and Tsugami B0125 trade advantages across different specifications, making neither a clear winner on paper alone. Your decision should come down to practical factors: which dealer is closer, which control system your operators already know, what tooling ecosystem you're invested in, and which machine's specific strengths match your highest-volume work. Get quotes on both, run test cuts with your actual parts if possible, and factor in long-term service and support costs.